Thursday, December 27, 2007

List Update

Remember the Christmas reading list? So far, I've finished On The Road, A Tree Grows in Brooklyn and Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (which I will not be writing about) and started The Omnivore's Dilemma. I hope to get around to posting about all of them in the relatively near future, so check back soon!

I'm also cutting The Dickens Hero from the list. I'll replace it with something else, but I returned the book to the library because frankly, I just didn't care.

On The Road

"Ah, man, what a dreamboat," sighed Dean. "Think if you and I had a car like this what we could do....Yes! You and I, Sal, we'd dig the whole world with a car like this, because, man, the road must eventually lead to the whole world. Ain't nowhere else it can go--right?"

I really didn't think I was ever going to finish On The Road. It's not like the book is that long, it's just kind of dense and it goes at such a breakneck pace that I had a hard time keeping up with it.

Rumors that Jack Kerouac was on Benzedrine while writing this book don't surprise me at all, as I found out he wrote the whole thing in something like three weeks from journal entries and such. Kerouac himself claims he wasn't on anything except caffeine (in coffee form, I believe, not, you know, grinding up caffeine pills and snorting them or anything). Knowing as I do how tripped out people can get on caffeine, I guess I wouldn't be surprised if that really was the only stimulant he used. But he was definitely on something, because this book is crazy.

Kerouac's book, as well as his character, Sal Paradise, bounce from one end of the continent to the other on borrowed money. The reader knows Sal is a World War Two veteran, going to school on the GI Bill, and many of his friends are veterans as well. However, other than that, the war is never mentioned.

Not to bring up Salinger again, but since Kerouac and Salinger were writing at the same time and had some similar experiences with the war and Buddhism, it's hard not to compare them in some way. Though Holden is a lot younger than Sal and was never in the war, both characters are totally disillusioned and frustrated with the previous generation. You won't see a lot of older people in On The Road, and the few that are present (like Sal's aunt) are on the fringes.

The main difference between the two of them is that Sal is always surrounded by people. As in the scene where Dean and Carlo are talking about everything they're thinking, he might not be interacting, but they are still there and reach out to him from time to time.

Sal is a people person, for lack of a better phrase, and he says he loves everyone around him, because they're all crazy. Holden says he hates everyone except Phoebe and Allie, and whether that's really true or not, the fact that Holden thinks he hates everyone and Sal knows he loves everyone is a major difference between their characters.

But now that's way too much on Salinger again. Back to Kerouac. I think On The Road is the answer to what all American heroes have been searching for since Huck Finn. Most American heroes want to go West, always West, and Sal does that -- he travels from New Jersey to Denver to San Francisco and back more times than I could keep track of. And I love how America seems too small, finally, for Sal and Dean, so they drive through Mexico, considering Mexico City the "end of the road."

NEXT: A Tree Grows in Brooklyn

Saturday, December 8, 2007

All I want for Christmas...

One of the things I'm looking forward to most about winter break is being able to read whatever I want, whenever I want.

I have not had the chance to read anything lately, other than a lot of feminist spirituality books for a class and lists of Latin verbs for another one, so I have a long list of books I want to read over break...so in the spirit of the holidays, here's my literary Christmas Wish List:

1) On the Road by Jack Kerouac
Not sure how I've missed this one so far. Jack Kerouac was one of the founding members of the Beat movement in the 60's, and wrote the whole thing in some insanely short amount of time on one huge roll of paper so the flow of his words wouldn't be interrupted by having to change the sheets in his typewriter.


2) A Tree Grows in Brooklyn by Betty Smith
This book has been recommended to me by two of my friends, as well as my grandmother and my mother. Seeing as my mother really doesn't tend to like "the classics" and my grandmother never reads fiction, I figure this is probably a pretty important book.

3) The Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael Pollan
This man is just brilliant. I started this book a while ago and never got around to finishing it, but just the first three pages managed to change my life, so I'm thinking I should finish it.

4) The Botany of Desire by Michael Pollan
See above: haven't started it, but this man is brilliant. He teaches journalism at Berkeley, incidentally.

5) The Dickens Hero by Beth Herst
I meant to read this for my thesis, and never quite got to the downtown library that had a copy of it. I still think it sounds really interesting, though, so I wanted to read it at some point and break is as good a time as any.


6) Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince by J. K. Rowling
My friend lent this to me about four months ago and I have yet to crack it open. I have been slowly working my way through the series since December of last year, when I bought Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone at a bookstore at King's Cross station in London and proceeded to finish most of it later on a bus ride back to the airport. But since Sirius is dead, I don't know how good it's going to be. Honestly, you've got to admire J. K. Rowling for her ability to just kill off major characters in a blaze of glory.

7) Moby Dick by Herman Melville
One of my friends told me she really liked this book, and again, she's not one to love traditional literary standards (this is the friend with whom I had an enormous argument about the merit of Great Expectations). Somehow I managed to miss it in my Early American Lit class.

8) The House of Seven Gables by Nathaniel Hawthorne
Same here-- managed to miss it. But this wasn't really recommended to me, more like my friend was trying to convince me not to read it and I thought it sounded cool...

Merry reading, everyone!

Friday, November 30, 2007

'Tis the season for Dickens

It's been a crazy few weeks, but finally I have a second to sit down and update this. I uploaded all my Christmas music, stole all the Christmas movies I could find from my parents' house, and am debating the merits of decorating my room.

One of my favorite parts of Christmas, though, is how it brings together two of my favorite things: Charles Dickens and the Muppets. If you haven't seen The Muppet Christmas Carol, you need to. Immediately. It's absolutely fantastic, and my favorite Christmas movie of all time.



Merry Christmas!

Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Cover that up

So I have to write a paper on disguise in 18th-century literature. I love disguise. I even kind of love 18th-century literature, so this topic is actually pretty exciting. What I don't like is the page limit, because 4-6 pages is just not going to be enough to spout all my thoughts on masking and taking on other identities.

My favorite book about disguise is not 18th century, but rather a retelling of the Cupid and Psyche myth called Til We Have Faces by C. S. Lewis. The main character, because she is not as beautiful as her sister Psyche, but extremely smart and a kick-ass Queen, decides to hide her face behind a veil. She comments on how most of her subjects cannot imagine that behind the veil is just an ugly woman; they say she's a goddess, or so beautiful that her face would stun anyone who looked on it, or that she's faceless, or any number of things except the simplest explanation.

That's the awesome thing about disguise in literature. Characters get to try on someone else's life or identity for a while, and basically become whomever they want. How they react and how other characters react to them says a lot about their personalities and motives, and I know more than once Shakespeare has used disguise to show characters' stupidity or malleability.

But often characters go into these other personas thinking they'll have unlimited freedom, and they just don't get it. They have rules and restrictions placed on them that they didn't expect. The Queen in Lewis's book is free from the stigma she'd receive if she were ugly, and endowed with a divine status by her more superstitious subjects. But she can never lift that veil, as it makes her Queen. Once she's put it on, she cannot revert to her status as an individual with faults and feelings like anyone else.

She has to supercede these limitations and own her original identity, though. The Queen takes a spiritual journey through her sister's trials -- her search for herself is connected with Psyche's search for Cupid. They're two halves of a whole, and the meaning of Psyche's name ("soul"), makes her representative of her sister's soul and identity.

That's true of anyone who disguises him or herself in literature; they always have to return to their own identity when all is said and done, and it's only when that happens that the world is right again.

Which, I guess, brings me back to Joseph Campbell's hero's journey...which is another topic for another blog post. :)

Monday, November 12, 2007

Cinderelly, Cinderelly

I was thinking this morning about how there has to be more to Cinderella. I'm not talking about turning the story into something like Ella Enchanted or Ever After (God forbid). I just mean that Cinderella is cooler than she's usually portrayed, and all because of the glass slipper, something that's usually kind of overlooked.

All the "updated" versions of the tale I have seen either ignore the issue of the slipper completely or hold that Cinderella left it by accident. In Ella Enchanted, the slipper has very little to do with Charmont's recognition of her, I believe that Ever After ignores it completely, and even the Disney version has Cinderella literally stepping out of her shoe on the stairs.

She had to have left the shoe on purpose. There's no way she could have just stepped out of it while running down the stairs. In order to be running that fast in those heels, they would have had to fit absolutely perfectly, especially for a girl who has been living her life as a maid and who is more used to going barefoot. And to run later in only one heel, as the Disney movie suggests, is virtually impossible and probably a scenario dreamed up by a man.

The French version of the tale says that Cinderella "left behind" one of her slippers; it's her stepsisters who attribute the loss to "haste." The Cinderella of this story is much more quick-witted than that of other versions; she "jests" with her sisters, "amusing" them (and herself) while in disguise, and though she is certainly patient and kind to them, it's easy to see how she is just biding her time until she can out-smart them and somehow gain control.

As opposed to just giving her the attributes of "graciousness" and a good heart, Perrault also gives her "intelligence, courage...[and] common sense", a list of virtues usually absent or ignored in this story. What girl wouldn't drop a slipper and hold on to the matching one, so the prince could track her down and make certain of her identity? It's really a brilliant move, and I think it's sad that the character doesn't get enough credit for it.

(As a side note, I love how blogs let you totally go off on tangents in the middle of a sentence with a simple hyperlink. I can point you to the French Cinderella without even breaking the rhythm of my sentence. Awesome.)

The Obligatory Welcoming Post

If you're reading this, you somehow found my blog. I know there's not much yet, but I promise at some point this will be my outlet for all literary thoughts that never make it into an English paper, for some reason.

Often, it's not going to make sense, and a lot of it is not so much based on scholarly research as it is my personal opinion on everything from Dickens to Chaucer to Rowling to Lahiri and whomever I happen to be reading at the moment. No doubt I will often write incredibly stupid stuff down, but hopefully some of you will find it interesting.

I'm open to co-authors as well, so feel free to comment with your interest! Happy Reading ~